Paula Scher: When Typography Has a Personality

• 

• 

• 

• 

After watching Helvetica, one designer who stood out to me was Paula Scher. What interested me about Scher was not only her work, but also her perspective on typography. The documentary presents Helvetica as a typeface that can represent simplicity, clarity, and modernism, but Scher’s perspective made me think about the opposite side of typography. Type does not always need to disappear into the background. Sometimes typography can actually become the personality of a design.

Scher is an American graphic designer who has been a partner at Pentagram since 1991. She began her career working as an art director in the music industry during the 1970s and 1980s, where she developed an expressive approach to typography. Over her career, she has worked on identities and campaigns for major organizations including The Public Theater, Microsoft, The Museum of Modern Art, The Metropolitan Opera, and the New York City Ballet.

The work that interests me most is her identity for The Public Theater in New York. Scher began working with the theater in 1994 and created a visual language inspired partly by the energy of street typography. Instead of making every word perfectly organized and quiet, she used large letters, different weights and sizes, tight spacing, and unexpected arrangements. The typography feels loud and energetic, almost like it is competing for your attention on a busy New York street. Her 1995 work for Bring in ’Da Noise, Bring in ’Da Funk, for example, surrounded the performer with bold wood-type lettering and helped establish a recognizable visual personality for the theater.

What I find especially interesting is how the Public Theater identity has been able to change without completely losing its personality. Different campaigns have stretched, slanted, outlined, layered, and manipulated typography while remaining recognizable as part of the same brand. To me, this shows that a brand identity does not necessarily have to mean repeating exactly the same layout every time. A strong visual system can give designers room to experiment.

As a graphic design student, this is probably the biggest lesson I took from Scher. I sometimes feel pressure to make designs extremely clean because clean design can automatically seem more “professional.” Scher’s work reminds me that professional design can still be playful, loud, imperfect, experimental, and full of personality. The important part is that those choices have a purpose.

That is also why her appearance in Helvetica was interesting to me. Helvetica represents one important philosophy of graphic design, but it is not the only solution. Scher’s work demonstrates how typography can communicate emotion before someone even reads the words. Size, weight, spacing, placement, repetition, and contrast all affect how we experience a message.

After learning more about Paula Scher, I see typography less as something that simply carries information and more as an actual visual material. A letter can function almost like a shape, an image, or even a voice. That is something I want to experiment with more in my own work. Instead of always asking, “Is this typography readable and clean?” I think another useful question is, “What does this typography feel like?”